Visa Bulletin, March 2024

What this issue did

The state of this issue

Counted inside this issue alone, before it is compared with anything published before it.

• Final Action Dates: 54 of 75 country columns carry a cut-off and 21 are current; every column has numbers. The furthest-back cut-off is 08SEP98, in F3 for Mexico. The widest gap between two countries inside one category is 165.3 months, in F1: Mexico against All areas, China and India, with 1 country somewhere between the two. Current in every column: EB-5 Rural, EB-5 High Unemployment and EB-5 Infrastructure. Current in 6 country columns of EB-1 and EB-5 Unreserved, though not in their other columns.
• Dates for Filing: 54 of 75 country columns carry a cut-off and 21 are current; every column has numbers. The furthest-back cut-off is 15APR01, in F4 for Mexico. The widest gap between two countries inside one category is 149 months, in F1: Mexico against All areas, China and India, with 1 country somewhere between the two. Current in every column: EB-5 Rural, EB-5 High Unemployment and EB-5 Infrastructure. Current in 6 country columns of EB-1 and EB-5 Unreserved, though not in their other columns.

How far the filing chart runs ahead

Of the 54 country columns where both charts carry a date in this issue, Dates for Filing runs ahead of Final Action Dates in 54 of them. The widest lead is 47 months, in F1 for Mexico. The middle lead is 5 months and the narrowest 14 days.

Where this issue sits in the archive

This is issue 6 of 36 published here, in a record running from October 2023 to September 2026.

Of the 75 country columns on the Final Action Dates chart, a cut-off appears both here and in September 2026, the newest issue published here, in 49 of them. Every one of them stands later in September 2026 than it does here, so the record ends ahead of where this issue leaves it. The middle difference across them is 36.5 months, and the largest is 80 months, in F1 for Mexico. That compares two ends and nothing in between: it says where these columns stand in each of the two issues, not that the queue only ever moved one way. A column can finish later than it began and still have fallen back on the way, and the category pages count the backward steps an endpoint comparison cannot see.

Of the 75 country columns on the Final Action Dates chart in this issue, 39 advanced, 0 moved backwards and 36 stood still. On the Dates for Filing chart, 10 advanced and 0 moved backwards.

Everything below is measured against February 2024, the issue immediately before this one.

The largest advances

• F4 for Philippines advanced 8 months, from 15OCT02 to 15JUN03. Over the three issues to March 2024 it advanced 9.8 months.
• EB-4 for All areas, China, India, Mexico and Philippines advanced 6.6 months, from 15MAY19 to 01DEC19. Over the three issues to March 2024 it advanced 11 months.
• EB-4 Religious Workers for All areas, China, India, Mexico and Philippines advanced 6.6 months, from 15MAY19 to 01DEC19. No longer window behind this issue is both complete and dated throughout, so there is nothing to set that against.
• F3 for All areas, China and India advanced 5.3 months, from 22APR09 to 01OCT09. Over the three issues to March 2024 it advanced 8.7 months.
• F2A for All areas, China, India and Philippines advanced 4.4 months, from 08FEB20 to 22JUN20. Over the three issues to March 2024 it advanced 16.4 months.
• F2A for Mexico advanced 4.4 months, from 01FEB20 to 15JUN20. Over the three issues to March 2024 it advanced 16.4 months.

Where the cut-off fell back

No cut-off on the Final Action Dates chart moved backwards in this issue.

By country of chargeability

• All areas: 10 of 15 country columns advanced, median advance 52 days.
• China: 8 of 15 country columns advanced, median advance 135 days.
• India: 8 of 15 country columns advanced, median advance 135 days.
• Mexico: 7 of 15 country columns advanced, median advance 30 days.
• Philippines: 6 of 15 country columns advanced, median advance 200 days.

Which chart applies for filing

Consular cases are approved against Final Action Dates. Which chart USCIS accepted for adjustment of status that month is published separately by USCIS and has not been transcribed here. How USCIS chooses the filing chart.

Every figure in this section is arithmetic on the transcribed tables: differences between two issues, runs of unchanged months, spreads between two countries in the same issue. The bulletin publishes no reasons, and none are supplied here.